5 responses

  1. Jay
    January 9, 2017

    Thanks for your thoughts you bougerois hack.

    Reply

    • shg
      January 9, 2017

      Spellcheck your insults to maximize impact.

      Reply

    • Noel Erinjeri
      January 9, 2017

      You’re welcome, you lumpenproletarian running-dog counter-revolutionary swine.

      Also, the Judaean People’s Front called, they want their invective back.

      NE

      Reply

  2. bacchys
    January 9, 2017

    It’s supposed to be hard to get a conviction, and exactly how does one arrive at a conclusion “beyond a reasonable doubt” when the entirety of the evidence is a he said/she said?

    Reply

  3. Leroy
    January 9, 2017

    This is certainly a problematic issue. Juries are known to convict based only on the testimony of a child, even when the accusation is so wildly unbelievable or outright impossible. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Day-care_sex-abuse_hysteria

    What would you suggest as a remedy for the perceived problem? Perhaps mandatory jury instructions letting them know that Children are known to make up stories when pressured by outside parties. And, that their testimony is unreliable?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.

Back to top
mobile desktop